Here is a fun Epic Theatre word search puzzle for students to engage with in their studies. This puzzle will enlighten students about the various concepts and devices that can be utilised in Epic Theatre plays, deepening their learning interactively. This post also outlines the similarities and differences between the two Epic Theatre theorists and practitioners, Erwin Piscator and Bertolt Brecht, who both worked in Berlin in the 1920s.
Introduction
The early 20th century marked a significant transformation in the theatre, witnessing the birth of what would later be known as ‘epic theatre’. This innovative approach aimed to engage the audience in a more critical and reflective manner, breaking away from the conventions of naturalistic theatre. Two figures stood at the forefront of this movement, pioneering their unique interpretations and methodologies: Erwin Piscator and Bertolt Brecht. Though their end goals aligned—to revolutionise theatre and its societal impact—their journeys, backgrounds, and foundational ideas laid distinct paths that would influence generations of theatre practitioners.
Erwin Piscator: The Political Agitator
Erwin Piscator, born in Greifenstein, Germany, in 1893, embarked on his theatrical journey amidst the socio-political tumult of post-World War I Germany. His experiences as a soldier deeply influenced his worldview, instilling a fervent commitment to socialism and a desire to use theatre as a tool for political education and change. Piscator’s early work in the theatre was marked by his efforts to infuse productions with a sense of political urgency, aiming to awaken the social consciousness of his audience.
After the war, Piscator settled in Berlin, a city that became a fertile ground for his experimental ventures. In 1920, he assumed directorship of the Proletarian Theatre in Berlin, which served as a launching pad for his exploration of theatre as a means of political engagement. Piscator’s approach to theatre was revolutionary; he sought to dismantle the traditional theatrical experience, advocating for a form of theatre that was educational, provocative, and directly tied to the socio-political realities of the time.
Piscator’s journey was characterised by constant innovation and experimentation. He utilized new technologies such as film and projections to expand the narrative capabilities of the stage, striving to create a more immersive and thought-provoking experience for the audience. His work in the 1920s, particularly with the Volksbühne (People’s Theatre), exemplified his commitment to a theatre that was not only entertaining but also enlightening, offering commentary on contemporary social issues.
Bertolt Brecht: The Literary Revolutionary
Born in 1898 in Augsburg, Germany, Bertolt Brecht’s approach to theatre was shaped by his literary background and a deep scepticism towards the established social order. Brecht’s early life was marked by a keen interest in literature and drama, though it was during his studies at Munich University and subsequent exposure to the bourgeois artistic scene in Berlin that his distinctive theatrical vision began to crystallise.
Brecht’s disillusionment with traditional theatre and its passive consumption by the audience led him to conceive a new approach aimed at fostering critical thinking and social awareness. Unlike Piscator, whose focus was predominantly on the political potential of theatre, Brecht was more concerned with the mechanics of storytelling and the relationship between the play and its audience. He sought to challenge the audience’s passive reception of narratives, encouraging them to question and critique the societal ideas presented to them.
The early 1920s were a period of intense creativity and experimentation for Brecht. He began to collaborate with notable composers and designers, experimenting with narrative structures and theatrical forms that would later become hallmarks of his approach to epic theatre. His collaborations with composer Kurt Weill and the staging of plays such as “The Threepenny Opera” showcased Brecht’s talent for combining political commentary with innovative theatrical techniques.
A Common Goal Through Different Paths
Though Piscator and Brecht embarked on their theatrical journeys from different starting points and with distinct methodologies, their underlying goal was remarkably similar: to create a form of theatre that could serve as a tool for societal reflection and change. Both practitioners sought to engage the audience in a dialogue, challenging them to reconsider their perceptions and beliefs about the world around them.
Piscator’s emphasis on the use of technology and multimedia in theatre aimed to bridge the gap between art and the audience, making the theatre experience more accessible and engaging. Meanwhile, Brecht’s focus on narrative innovation and the intellectual engagement of the audience sought to transform theatre into a forum for critical thinking and debate.
Epic Theatre Word Search Puzzle
Best experience on desktop or tablet.
