1 Pointless Theatre of the Absurd Play for Students
This original Theatre of the Absurd play is great for the Drama or Theatre classroom. It is written in such a manner that, through dialogue and action, it clearly explains the main conventions of the Theatre of the Absurd movement for students.
Theatre of the Absurd Play Script
Use this Theatre of the Absurd play script as a starting point for teaching this wonderful, but complex performance style. While there is little doubt Samuel Beckett’s masterpiece Waiting for Godot ticks all the boxes for Absurdism, students will find the play script, below, much more accessible. Teacher notes explaining the conventions outlined in each scene are included. Have a read of the play on the page, first, then download the PDF with teacher notes at the bottom of the post. Enjoy!
This Play is Absurd
A meaningless tale of existentialism
Characters
CHARLIE – Trapped in an endless cycle of uncertainty and confusion.
ALEX – The only other person CHARLIE ever encounters. Acts as a mirror, sounding board, and instigator.
ALEX and CHARLIE are both genderless.
SCENE 1: THE REPETITION OF THE RIDICULOUS
An empty stage. CHARLIE enters from stage left, wheeling a large box adorned with pictures of socks. A chair is in the centre of the stage.
CHARLIE: (to audience, with grave solemnity) In the Theatre of the Absurd, life’s cyclical nature is often portrayed. A continuous loop of meaningless efforts and hollow triumphs. Like this box, you see. It’s full of socks. Red socks, blue socks, yellow socks, green socks. Every day, I fill this box, and every day, the socks vanish. (Opens the box, showing it’s empty, and is perplexed) Oh, that’s strange. The socks are gone. Again.
(ALEX enters from stage right, wearing a sock puppet on one hand.)
ALEX: (with enthusiasm, talking through the sock puppet) Oh, a box! Is it full of socks?
CHARLIE: (gravely) It was full of socks. Red socks, blue socks, yellow socks, green socks. But they’re gone.
ALEX: (confused) Gone? Where did they go?
CHARLIE: (with growing despair) I don’t know. Every day, I fill this box with socks, and every day, they vanish.
ALEX: (curiously) Have you tried looking for them?
CHARLIE: (frustrated) Look for them? Look where? The socks are always missing.
ALEX: (with resolve) Then let’s fill the box again. With socks.
CHARLIE: (reluctant) We could, but they’ll be gone again.
ALEX: (insistent) Maybe not this time.
(They pantomime filling the box with imaginary socks, then close the lid.)
CHARLIE: (opens the box again, finding it empty, distressed) They’re gone again!
ALEX: (dumbfounded) But how? We just put them there!
CHARLIE: (to audience, broken) You see? The cycle continues. It’s futile. It’s all futile. Red socks, blue socks, yellow socks, green socks. Here and then gone. It’s like life itself.
(They repeat the cycle several more times, each repetition becoming more useless and desperate.)
ALEX: (to audience, breathless) We are the sock-fillers, endlessly toiling, filling a box that can never be filled. Like Sisyphus, pushing his boulder up the hill, only to have it roll back down. Our existence is a perpetual loop.
CHARLIE: (to audience, exasperated) An absurd loop. A loop filled with red socks, blue socks, yellow socks, green socks. And by ‘absurd’, I don’t mean ridiculous. I mean meaningless. Out of harmony with my very existence.
(After several repetitions, they collapse next to the box.)
ALEX: (softly, almost whispering) Are we the socks, CHARLIE? Are we the ones who are missing?
CHARLIE: (softly, defeated, with tears) I think we are, ALEX. I think we are.
(Lights dim to blackout.)
SCENE 2: THE ABSURDITY OF LANGUAGE
The stage is filled with large, tangible objects resembling letters, words, and punctuation marks. Tables are strewn with dictionary pages, grammar books, and there are projections of linguistic symbols on the backdrop. CHARLIE and ALEX move among these symbols, alternating between fascination and frustration.
CHARLIE: (to audience, eloquently) In the Theatre of the Absurd, language is an enigma. A fascinating, frustrating enigma. It promises to connect yet often leads to misunderstanding. It gives form to thought yet restricts and confines.
ALEX: (picking up the letter ‘A’, to CHARLIE) What is this alone?
CHARLIE: (assuredly) An ‘A’, the first building block of our words.
ALEX: (holding the ‘A’ up, contemplating) But alone it’s void of meaning. It’s empty.
CHARLIE: (thoughtfully) As are many things in isolation.
ALEX: (beginning to arrange letters) We build words, sentences, but do they not fall apart just as easily?
CHARLIE: (joining in, arranging) They do. The fragility of language mirrors our human fragility.
ALEX: (building a nonsensical word) Here’s a word. A new word.
CHARLIE: (looking, smiling) It’s playful, but it’s nonsense to the world.
ALEX: (emphatically) It’s meaningful to me.
CHARLIE: (explaining) Language, though, is a shared dance. It’s not a solo performance.
ALEX: (crafting a sentence, eyes wide) Here’s a sentence!
CHARLIE: (squinting) It’s incomprehensible. But isn’t that the essence of life? Isn’t much of what we say and do equally incomprehensible?
ALEX: (to audience, pondering) How many times do we speak past each other, our words failing us, our meanings lost?
(They move more frantically, building and dismantling structures of words and sentences. They take turns reading passages from the scattered dictionary pages, sometimes with understanding, sometimes with bewilderment.)
CHARLIE: (reflecting) Here in this absurd space, words lose their authority. They become toys, detached from their essence.
ALEX: (passionately) They dance, they sing, they tease us with meaning.
CHARLIE: (gravely) But they can also ensnare us, trap us in a cycle of endless misunderstanding.
(They pause, looking at the chaos they’ve created. They begin to rearrange the words into poetry, fragments of songs, abstract expressions.)
ALEX: (softly, to audience) Language, dear friends, is a labyrinth. It invites us in with the promise of clarity but leads us into endless twists and turns.
CHARLIE: (adding) It’s the dance of human connection and disconnection. The Theatre of the Absurd teaches us to see language not just as a tool but as a living, breathing entity, full of whimsy and contradiction.
(Melancholic music plays. CHARLIE and ALEX continue to move the words and letters, creating fleeting images and transient meanings. The movement becomes a choreographed dance, both graceful and chaotic.)
ALEX: (whispering, as the dance slows) Words, sentences, thoughts—they’re all momentary. They’re here, and then they vanish.
CHARLIE: (softly, concluding) Just like us.
(Lights dim to a gentle glow, focusing on the lingering arrangement of words and letters. CHARLIE and ALEX exit, leaving the stage filled with the silent echoes of their linguistic exploration.)
SCENE 3: THE INESCAPABLE UNCERTAINTY
The stage is stark except for a giant, comically oversized padlock fixed to a large, unidentifiable object hidden under a cloth. The padlock gleams under a spotlight. A similarly oversized key lies on a pedestal nearby. CHARLIE stands, studying the padlock and key with a look of intense concentration.
CHARLIE: (to audience, philosophically) In the Theatre of the Absurd, uncertainty is not just a theme, it’s a condition. A condition of existence. The very fabric of our reality is woven with questions, contradictions, and unresolvable puzzles.
(CHARLIE picks up the key and approaches the padlock, attempting to unlock it. The key doesn’t fit. CHARLIE tries again, more forcefully.)
CHARLIE: (to audience, frustrated) We seek answers, solutions, resolutions, but are often met with unyielding obstacles. The right key for the right lock – should be simple. But life rarely grants us simplicity.
(ALEX enters, intrigued by the struggle.)
ALEX: (cheerfully) Having trouble?
CHARLIE: (exasperated) This key should fit. It looks as though it should fit.
ALEX: (examining the key) May I try?
CHARLIE: (handing over the key) Be my guest.
(ALEX attempts to unlock the padlock, with exaggerated, theatrical movements, both comically and seriously. The key doesn’t fit.)
ALEX: (to CHARLIE, flippantly) Well, it’s A key. Can’t say whether it’s the RIGHT key.
CHARLIE: (disheartened) But shouldn’t there be a right key? A solution to every problem?
ALEX: (to audience, philosophically) Ah, but the Absurd tells us that certainty is an illusion. The pursuit of answers often leads to more questions, more confusion.
(They take turns trying different ways to unlock the padlock, each attempt more absurd than the last. They try together, they try alone, they examine the lock, the key, the object it’s attached to, but all to no avail.)
CHARLIE: (despairingly) It’s hopeless.
ALEX: (contemplatively) Or perhaps it’s simply a question without an answer.
CHARLIE: (to audience, poignantly) And isn’t that the crux of our existence? The striving, the yearning, the endless seeking, only to find that some things remain locked away, beyond our grasp?
(A pause. A moment of quiet reflection. The key and the padlock seem to loom larger, symbolising the inscrutability of existence.)
ALEX: (softly) Maybe the question isn’t in the unlocking, but in the understanding that some things are meant to remain locked.
CHARLIE: (realising) And that, too, is part of the human experience.
(They leave the key and padlock, stepping back, accepting the impossibility of their task.)
ALEX: (to audience, concluding) In the Theatre of the Absurd, we are constantly reminded of the inescapable uncertainty that shadows our lives. We may seek, strive, and struggle, but some questions remain unanswered, some doors remain unopened.
(Lights dim, with the key and padlock still gleaming, a permanent reminder of life’s unresolvable mysteries.)
SCENE 4: THE ETERNAL WAITING
The stage is barren except for two worn-out stools, placed in the middle of a void-like setting. The lighting is dim, creating a sense of unending emptiness. CHARLIE and ALEX enter, looking around as if expecting something, or someone. They slowly approach the stools and sit down, facing the audience but not really seeing them.
CHARLIE: (to audience, contemplatively) Here, we wait. But for what, we do not know. Time loses meaning, substance, form. In the Theatre of the Absurd, waiting becomes a metaphor for existence itself.
(A long pause follows, filled with nothing but the sound of breathing and the occasional shifting of weight. The silence becomes unbearable, almost palpable.)
ALEX: (suddenly, to CHARLIE) Shall we play a game?
CHARLIE: (without enthusiasm) What kind of game?
ALEX: (brightly) ‘I Spy.’
CHARLIE: (resigned) Very well.
(ALEX starts the game of ‘I Spy,’ but they never spy anything that is actually present on the stage. Each guess becomes more abstract and removed from reality.)
ALEX: I spy with my little eye something beginning with ‘H.’
CHARLIE: (looking around, confused) Hope?
ALEX: (laughing) No, silly! A hat.
CHARLIE: (searching the stage) But there’s no hat here.
ALEX: (dismissively) No matter. Your turn.
(They continue, each round more disconnected from reality. They spy things like ‘dreams,’ ‘regret,’ ’emptiness,’ and ‘infinity.’)
CHARLIE: (to audience, insightfully) In the Absurdist view, even our diversions, our games, our attempts to fill the time are devoid of meaning. They illustrate the aimlessness, the meaningless activity that defines our lives.
(The game becomes more monotonous, more mechanical. The characters start to lose interest, their enthusiasm waning.)
ALEX: (yawning) I spy with my little eye something beginning with ‘T.’
CHARLIE: (dully) Time?
ALEX: (musing) Time… Time indeed.
(They fall silent again, the game abandoned, the waiting resumed. The lack of action, the stillness of the scene, becomes oppressive.)
CHARLIE: (to audience, sorrowfully) We wait and we wait. We play games, we distract ourselves, but the waiting never ends. It is the essence of our being, the eternal condition.
ALEX: (softly) And what are we waiting for?
CHARLIE: (hopelessly) I don’t know.
(A long pause. They continue to sit, staring into the distance, waiting for something that will never come.)
ALEX: (to audience, concluding) Waiting is not just a physical act; it’s a state of mind, a representation of our perpetual search for meaning in a world that offers none.
(Lights slowly fade, leaving CHARLIE and ALEX in darkness, still waiting.)
SCENE 5: THE IRRATIONALITY OF TIME
The stage is filled with alarm clocks of various sizes and shapes. Some are hanging, some are on pedestals, and some are scattered on the floor. CHARLIE and ALEX enter, each holding an alarm clock. The alarms are going off at irregular intervals, creating a cacophony of chimes and beeps.
CHARLIE: (frustrated, to the audience) Time, that elusive master. It governs us, torments us, tricks us.
ALEX: (to CHARLIE, calmly but with a hint of madness) It’s time.
CHARLIE: (exasperated) But time for what? Time to eat? Time to sleep? Time to breathe?
ALEX: (philosophically) Who knows? It’s always time for something. Or perhaps it’s never time for anything at all.
(They continue to set and reset the alarms, the noise growing louder, more discordant.)
CHARLIE: (over the noise, shouting) But what is time? Is it linear? Cyclical? Eternal? Fleeting? It slips through our fingers even as we grasp it.
ALEX: (laughing, playing with an alarm clock) Time is a construct, CHARLIE. A human invention. It’s as irrational as it is unavoidable.
CHARLIE: (to audience, contemplatively) In the Theatre of the Absurd, time is portrayed as arbitrary, unreliable, and irrational. It doesn’t follow the rules; it creates its own.
(They manipulate the clocks, speeding them up, slowing them down, stopping and starting them. The alarms go off unpredictably, underscoring the chaos.)
ALEX: (to CHARLIE, suddenly serious) But don’t you see? Time is a mirror, reflecting our own inconsistencies, our own confusions.
CHARLIE: (pausing, reflecting) A mirror that we cannot escape. A mirror that distorts.
ALEX: (poetically) A mirror that reflects the absurdity of our existence.
(The alarms begin to synchronise, then diverge again, the pattern ever-changing.)
CHARLIE: (to audience, profoundly) Time is not a straight line, nor a perfect circle. It’s a tangled web, a twisted maze. We are caught in its trap, forever lost, forever searching.
ALEX: (softly, almost a whisper) And yet, we continue to measure it, to quantify it, to give it form and structure. But it defies us, always.
(They slowly stop the alarms one by one, the noise gradually dying down.)
CHARLIE: (to audience, concluding) Time, dear audience, is an enigma. In the Theatre of the Absurd, it becomes a character unto itself, unpredictable and unfathomable. It reminds us of the irrationality of our existence, of the chaos that lies beneath the surface.
(The lights fade as CHARLIE and ALEX stand amidst the silent clocks, lost in thought.)
SCENE 6: THE MEANINGLESSNESS OF IDENTITY
The stage is filled with mirrors of different sizes and shapes, some whole, some shattered. CHARLIE and ALEX look at their reflections, moving from one mirror to another. Their expressions change from intrigue to confusion to amusement.
CHARLIE: (to audience) In the Theatre of the Absurd, identity is fluid, elusive, and ultimately meaningless. Who are we, truly? Are we the reflections we see in the mirror, or are we something more?
ALEX: (to CHARLIE, mockingly) Oh, I see myself! There I am. But wait, is that really me?
CHARLIE: (playfully) Perhaps you’re me, and I’m you.
ALEX: (enthusiastically) Let’s find out!
(CHARLIE and ALEX swap clothes, then pretend to be each other. They exaggerate the other’s mannerisms, laughing and parodying, demonstrating the mutable and performative nature of identity.)
ALEX: (as CHARLIE, to audience) Observe, dear audience, how easily we change. Our clothes, our speech, our gestures—these are but masks.
CHARLIE: (as ALEX, pondering) But what lies beneath the mask? Who are we when the performance ends?
(They switch back, their movements becoming more introspective, contemplative.)
ALEX: (to CHARLIE, sincerely) Is there a true self? A core identity? Or are we forever changing, forever adapting?
CHARLIE: (to audience, philosophically) The Absurdist’s view of identity is one of constant flux. We are never fixed, never certain. We play roles, we wear masks, but the true self remains hidden, perhaps even from ourselves.
(They begin to distort their reflections, manipulating the mirrors, creating funhouse effects.)
ALEX: (to audience, gleefully) Look how we stretch and bend! Look how we fracture and fragment! Identity is a game, a dance, a never-ending journey.
CHARLIE: (to ALEX, sombrely) But it’s also a trap. A paradox. We seek to know ourselves, but the more we look, the more we lose.
(They pause, staring deeply into the mirrors, their faces a mixture of fascination and despair.)
ALEX: (to audience, softly) In the Theatre of the Absurd, the self is a riddle, an enigma. We seek answers, but find only questions. We seek stability, but find only chaos.
CHARLIE: (to audience, concluding) We are, dear audience, forever unknown, even to ourselves. Identity, like time, like language, like existence itself, is a labyrinth without an exit.
(The lights fade as CHARLIE and ALEX continue to gaze into the mirrors, lost in contemplation.)
SCENE 7: THE CONFLICT OF EXISTENTIALISM
The stage is bare except for a large, heavy rock placed centre stage. CHARLIE is alone, struggling to move the rock to one side of the stage. Sweat drips down CHARLIE’s face, and the strain is evident in every muscle.
CHARLIE: (to audience, panting) We often find ourselves caught in futile tasks, exerting effort but achieving nothing. Why this rock? Why this place? There is no answer, only the task.
(After much effort, CHARLIE finally moves the rock to the other side, collapsing in exhaustion. There’s a triumphant look on CHARLIE’s face, only for it to turn to horror as the rock slowly but inevitably rolls back to its original position.)
CHARLIE: (to audience, defeated) The myth of Sisyphus comes to life. We struggle, we strain, we achieve, and yet, the achievement is undone. Is this not the essence of our existence?
(ALEX enters, watching CHARLIE’s struggle with the rock, bemused.)
ALEX: (teasingly) Why are you doing this, CHARLIE?
CHARLIE: (frustrated) Why? Why indeed! Does there need to be a reason?
ALEX: (philosophically) Perhaps there does, perhaps there doesn’t. But isn’t the struggle itself a form of meaning?
CHARLIE: (angrily) Meaning? What meaning can there be in this endless, pointless task?
ALEX: (calmly) The meaning you give it. The will to continue, the refusal to succumb.
CHARLIE: (bitterly) But to what end? The rock will always return. The task is never complete.
ALEX: (reflectively) And isn’t that the case with life itself? We strive, we falter, we succeed, we fail. The cycle continues, and yet, we persist.
CHARLIE: (hopelessly) It’s a cruel joke. A game without winners.
ALEX: (encouragingly) Or perhaps a dance. A dance with existence.
(CHARLIE looks at ALEX, then at the rock, and starts to push it again. This time, ALEX joins in. They push together, the task becoming a shared experience.)
CHARLIE: (to audience, resolutely) This rock, this task, it symbolises the human condition. The struggle may be absurd, the outcome uncertain, but we endure. We persist. We find meaning in the meaninglessness.
(ALEX and CHARLIE continue to push the rock, laughing, struggling, sharing the burden. The rock moves, then rolls back, and they begin again.)
ALEX: (to audience, concluding) In the Theatre of the Absurd, the conflict of existentialism is laid bare. Life’s struggles may seem arbitrary, even cruel, but they are ours. We own them, we shape them, we live them.
(Lights fade as CHARLIE and ALEX continue their Sisyphean task, their laughter and determination echoing in the darkness.)
SCENE 8: THE ILLUSION OF FREEDOM
The stage is dimly lit, with a large birdcage centre stage. The door of the cage is wide open. ALEX is inside, peering out at the audience.
ALEX: (to audience, contemplatively) We may think we are free, but often we are imprisoned by our own limitations. What is freedom? A choice? An action? Or a mere illusion?
(CHARLIE enters, looking surprised to see ALEX inside the cage.)
CHARLIE: (curiously) ALEX, what are you doing in there?
ALEX: (serenely) I’m enjoying my freedom.
CHARLIE: (incredulous) Freedom? In a cage? Come out!
ALEX: (refusing) But why? The door is open. I can leave whenever I wish.
CHARLIE: (frustrated) But you’re trapped in there!
ALEX: (calmly) Am I? Or is the cage merely a metaphor for our existence? Are we not all confined by the limitations we impose upon ourselves?
CHARLIE: (impatiently) That’s philosophical nonsense. Come out and experience real freedom.
ALEX: (reflectively) But what is real freedom? The ability to move? To choose? To act? What if our choices are determined by our upbringing, our society, our fears? What if our actions are guided by unseen forces?
CHARLIE: (emphatically) That’s defeatist thinking. We have the power to change, to grow, to break free from our constraints.
ALEX: (slyly) Do we? Or are those beliefs themselves a form of self-imposed limitation?
CHARLIE: (exasperated) You’re speaking in riddles. Come out, and let’s discuss this like rational beings.
ALEX: (smiling) Rationality, too, is a cage. A beautiful, intricate cage, but a cage nonetheless.
CHARLIE: (softly, pleading) ALEX, step out of the cage. Experience the world outside.
ALEX: (reflecting) Perhaps one day. But for now, I choose to remain.
(CHARLIE, defeated, joins ALEX inside the cage. They sit, looking out at the audience.)
CHARLIE: (to audience, sombrely) In the Theatre of the Absurd, the cage is not a physical construct but a mental one. Our fears, our beliefs, our rationality, all can become barriers to true freedom.
ALEX: (to audience, concluding) And sometimes, the cage is not a prison but a sanctuary, a place to ponder, to question, to embrace our contradictions.
(Lights fade as ALEX and CHARLIE continue to explore the concept of freedom, their dialogue filled with curiosity, doubt, and acceptance.)
SCENE 9: THE ENDLESS END
The stage is set just as it was in Scene One. CHARLIE enters, carrying the same box from before. His movements mirror those from the beginning, almost in a ritualistic fashion. The air is filled with a sense of déjà vu.
CHARLIE: (to audience, in a measured tone) This box, you see, is full of socks. Red socks, blue socks, yellow socks, and green socks. Our existence is like this box, filled with variety but confined within boundaries.
(ALEX enters, mirroring their entrance from Scene 1. The excitement in their eyes is the same, yet there is a subtle weariness.)
ALEX: (with a rehearsed enthusiasm) Oh, a box! Is it full of socks?
CHARLIE: (pausing, considering) Yes, full of socks. But aren’t we all, in some way, full of socks? Full of trivialities, repetitions, meaningless cycles?
ALEX: (pondering) Full of socks, yes. But are they ever paired? Do they ever truly match?
CHARLIE: (to audience, insightfully) Here lies the conundrum. In our attempts to order, to categorise, to make sense of the chaos, we often find ourselves lost in an endless loop.
(ALEX begins to rummage through the box, pulling out mismatched socks, holding them up to each other, never finding a pair.)
ALEX: (frustrated) They never match, CHARLIE! They never do.
CHARLIE: (calmly) And perhaps they’re not meant to. Perhaps the mismatch is the match.
ALEX: (to audience, solemnly) In the Theatre of the Absurd, existence is cyclical, repetitive, futile. Our actions are echoes, our words mere reverberations.
(They continue to play with the socks, attempting to pair them, failing time and again, the actions becoming more mechanical, more meaningless.)
CHARLIE: (reflecting) And yet, we persist. We search for meaning in the mismatch, for purpose in the chaos.
ALEX: (despondent) But do we ever find it?
CHARLIE: (softly) Perhaps not. But we continue to search, nonetheless.
(A pause. They look at the box, the jumble of colours, the disarray of patterns.)
ALEX: (to audience, concluding) The play ends just as it began, dear audience. A box of socks. A cycle of existence. A dance of absurdity. We are left to ponder the cyclical, unchanging nature of existence, trapped in a loop of our own making.
(CHARLIE and ALEX are frozen in contemplation. The mismatched socks scattered, the box left open. They gaze out over the audience in silence. A long pause. The lights slowly fade to darkness.)
Free Theatre of the Absurd resources on The Drama Teacher
Free Theatre of the Absurd resources on the Drama Teacher’s sister site Theatre Links
Teacher Notes for This Play is Absurd
SCENE 1: THE REPETITION OF THE RIDICULOUS
In this scene, the cyclical and futile nature of existence is conveyed. The endless task of filling the box with imaginary socks, only for them to disappear repeatedly, serves as an allegory for the inherent meaninglessness and repetitiveness of life as perceived in the Theatre of the Absurd. The dialogue reinforces this theme, echoing the philosophy of existentialism. The characters are trapped in an unending loop, symbolising the human condition’s tragic yet absurd quality. This scene underscores the futile nature of the human action, the repetitive patterns of life, and the poignant yearning for meaning in a seemingly meaningless world, all of which are key conventions of the Theatre of the Absurd.
SCENE 2: THE ABSURDITY OF LANGUAGE
This scene delves into the futility and complexity of language, adding layers of interaction, reflection, and physicality. The characters’ dialogue with each other and the audience, their manipulation of the tangible symbols of language, and their choreographed dance with words all serve to underscore the Absurdist view of communication as both an art form and a conundrum.
The scene becomes a microcosm of the human struggle for meaning and connection in a world that often defies understanding. The cyclical nature of their conversation and their ultimate realisation of the transient nature of words reinforces the Absurdist concept of the cyclical and futile nature of existence.
SCENE 3: THE INESCAPABLE UNCERTAINTY
This scene dives into the existential uncertainty and frustration emblematic of the Theatre of the Absurd. By exploring the characters’ physical and emotional struggle with a seemingly simple task, the scene brings to life the greater philosophical struggle with the unknowable aspects of existence. The oversized padlock and key become metaphors for life’s larger questions, the search for meaning, and the acceptance of uncertainty.
SCENE 4: THE ETERNAL WAITING
This scene discusses the theme of eternal waiting, reflecting one of the most profound aspects of the Theatre of the Absurd. It symbolises the human condition of waiting for something undefined and unreachable. The dialogue and long pauses serve to evoke both the emptiness and the yearning that characterise the Absurdist perspective. The futile game of ‘I Spy’ adds a layer of complexity, highlighting the equally futile attempts to fill time with meaning in a world devoid of intrinsic purpose. The scene concludes with a melancholic acknowledgment of the inescapable uncertainty that defines existence.
SCENE 5: THE IRRATIONALITY OF TIME
This scene demonstrates the complex and multifaceted nature of time, a common theme in the Theatre of the Absurd. Through dialogue and stage action, the scene explores the contradictory and elusive nature of time, symbolised by the ever-changing patterns of the alarm clocks. The characters’ interactions with the clocks serve as a metaphor for humanity’s constant struggle to understand and control time, highlighting the absurdity and futility of these efforts. The scene captures the irrationality, unpredictability, and existential contemplation that characterise this theatrical movement.
SCENE 6: THE MEANINGLESSNESS OF IDENTITY
This scene explores the theme of identity, a prevalent concept in the Theatre of the Absurd. Through dialogue, action, and the symbolic use of mirrors, the scene delves into the complex, multifaceted nature of selfhood. It illustrates the Absurdists’ view that identity is mutable, performative, and ultimately unknowable. The characters’ playful swapping of roles highlights the constructed nature of identity, while their reflective monologues reveal the existential uncertainty that underlies their seemingly frivolous actions.
SCENE 7: THE CONFLICT OF EXISTENTIALISM
This scene explores the existential conflict that characterises the Theatre of the Absurd. The struggle with the rock, reminiscent of the myth of Sisyphus, serves as a powerful metaphor for the human condition, capturing the futility, frustration, and also the resilience and camaraderie that define our existence. The dialogue explores philosophical themes, including the search for meaning, the nature of effort, and the resilience of the human spirit.
SCENE 8: THE ILLUSION OF FREEDOM
This scene examines the complex concept of freedom, questioning its very nature and exploring how it can be both a reality and an illusion. By using the birdcage as a symbol, the scene illustrates the ways in which we might confine ourselves, knowingly or unknowingly, within certain limitations. The dialogue between CHARLIE and ALEX oscillates between rationality and existential inquiry, highlighting the multifaceted nature of human understanding and the ambiguities that define our existence.
SCENE 9: THE ENDLESS END
This scene reinforces the central theme of the cyclical, unchanging nature of existence, a key convention of the Theatre of the Absurd. The dialogue intertwines with the action to illustrate the philosophical underpinning of the Absurdist view. The repeated actions and mirrored entrances serve to create a visual metaphor for the repetitive, monotonous nature of life. The box of socks becomes a symbol for the complexities of existence, the ceaseless search for meaning, and the inescapable pattern of life’s cycles. The scene encapsulates the existential angst, the circularity of life, and the futility of the human condition that characterises the Theatre of the Absurd.
PDF download of the script This Play is Absurd and Teacher Notes.
